"When a sexual assault, circulation of documentation of an assault, and vicious victim-blaming for an assault are subsumed into the bullying narrative, it obscures the truth of what happened. If such things are filed away under bullying, we fail to name them as instances of gender-based violence, exploitation, and harassment that are enabled by a culture that minimizes, dismisses, and normalizes violence against women."

— Beth Lyons, On Calling Things By Name: Rape, Exploitation and Victim-Blaming Aren’t Bullying at Shameless Magazine (April 11th, 2013)

"Even though I cannot be sorry that certain dead visionary women have attained in death the adoration they deserved in life — I’ve already mentioned Sylvia Plath, or Anne Frank or Virginia Woolf (Marilyn Monroe? Amy Winehouse?) — there is also something creepily avuncular and overheated about the culture industry “cumming” all over what it either never honestly bothered to nourish or insisted on taking only exactly the way it wanted to. Female commentators, including the brilliant ones, are often beset by the problem of (over)identification when they write about such figures, while male commentators cannot seem to give praise or produce readings, however just, without betraying a kind of respectful arousal (or aroused respect?) rendering themselves the somewhat abashedly horny liberal uncles of the world, free to jizz into history on the figure of the actual woman whose intention it was decidedly not, via her photographs, to merely physically seduce them."

Ariana Reines, “An Hourglass Figure: On Photographer Francesca Woodman” (April 4th, 2013)

I’ve read this twice in twenty-four hours. I cannot shake this.

"Nobody pays me to say anything. If anything, they might pay me not to say things, but that doesn’t work either."

MARGARET ATWOOD to me for the spring ish of BULLETT.

You better read.

(via snpsnpsnp)

AND THIS IS WHY MARGARET ATWOOD IS BOSS.

redcatg:

…this is a very important piece that explains why Femen’s idea of feminism is so terrible and fucked up!

“Can feminism survive unless it sheds its Eurocentric bias and starts accepting that the experiences of all women should be seen as legitimate?”

recommended reading!

(via theuntitledmag)

killyourinspiration:

I am so fucking done with tumblr going apeshit over feminist and anti-racist statements that famous white men make.  Want to end patriarchy? Stop legitimizing the power of a wealthy white man’s words over mine or yours.  For every famous white man whose power you indulge, you are taking space away from the people who live this shit every day.  You contribute to the invisibility of people of colour, queers, trans people, women, people with disabilities, fat people, poor people.  You reify the politics you rally against.  You are setting us back. 

And I know that these are famous white men whose work means a lot to you - because there are quite a few famous white men whose work means a lot to me.  But resistance is not another platform for their voices.  They have enough already.  They can sit down and shut the fuck up and let people with lived marginalized experiences tell our own stories for once. 

littlearchitect:


episodesandparallels:


genderqueerfashionista:


the-unfeminine-female:


Androgyny at its finest right here.


This caption infuriates me. Androgyny is so much more than just a thin, white person with no breasts and short hair. Androgyny, from my perspective, is the blending of masculine and feminine elements in any and all forms. Androgyny isn’t looking male, it’s looking like a human who expresses both masculinity and creates new gender options. It doesn’t just apply white male standards of attractiveness to female bodies but works to broaden the shades of gray.
These folks have the kind of androgyny I’m talking about:

my beau, N

hisblackdress

boyqueen

streetstyle via blackfashion

majestic

man in a skirt via sean at fruitpunch
how would y’all define androgyny in a way that’s more inclusive?


hey world, listen. i’m reblogging this for reasons beyond the fact that i’m in it. HERE’S THE THING. skinny/white/short-haired folks with no boobs who look boyish ARE NOT THE IDEAL OF ANDROGYNY and that needs to change. essentially all we’re doing by this is continuing the idea WHITE AND SKINNY AND MASCULINE is the ideal definition of attractiveness. you know who else is white and skinny and masculine? LOTS OF EMPOWERED MEN WHO ARE ALREADY RUNNIN’ SHIT. so. they have enough power, let’s not let androgyny be living up to that standard too, rather, let’s focus on new standards of beauty.

littlearchitect:

episodesandparallels:

genderqueerfashionista:

the-unfeminine-female:

Androgyny at its finest right here.

This caption infuriates me. Androgyny is so much more than just a thin, white person with no breasts and short hair. Androgyny, from my perspective, is the blending of masculine and feminine elements in any and all forms. Androgyny isn’t looking male, it’s looking like a human who expresses both masculinity and creates new gender options. It doesn’t just apply white male standards of attractiveness to female bodies but works to broaden the shades of gray.

These folks have the kind of androgyny I’m talking about:

image

my beau, N

image

hisblackdress

image

boyqueen

image

streetstyle via blackfashion

image

majestic

image

man in a skirt via sean at fruitpunch

how would y’all define androgyny in a way that’s more inclusive?

hey world, listen. i’m reblogging this for reasons beyond the fact that i’m in it. HERE’S THE THING. skinny/white/short-haired folks with no boobs who look boyish ARE NOT THE IDEAL OF ANDROGYNY and that needs to change. essentially all we’re doing by this is continuing the idea WHITE AND SKINNY AND MASCULINE is the ideal definition of attractiveness. you know who else is white and skinny and masculine? LOTS OF EMPOWERED MEN WHO ARE ALREADY RUNNIN’ SHIT. so. they have enough power, let’s not let androgyny be living up to that standard too, rather, let’s focus on new standards of beauty.

teenkate:

can we just make a word for all the poorly-adjusted emotional people in this world who have identified heartily with every album fiona apple has ever written, over time? cuz i feel like this is the most obvious way to feel and i would just be happier if we all admitted it and could embrace some common vernacular

"This is about all the bad days in the world. I used to have some little bad days, and I kept them in a little box. And one day, I threw them out into the yard. “Oh, it’s just a couple little innocent bad days.” Well, we had a big rain. I don’t know what it was growing in but I think we used to put eggshells out there and coffee grounds, too. Don’t plant your bad days. They grow into weeks. The weeks grow into months. Before you know it you got yourself a bad year. Take it from me. Choke those little bad days. Choke ‘em down to nothin’. They’re your days. Choke ‘em!"

— Tom Waits (via withnailrules)

(via ourheartsareloudandwillnotrest)

"Not being racist is not some default starting position. You don’t simply get to say you’re not a racist; not being racist — or a sexist or a homophobe — is a constant, arduous process of unlearning, of being uncomfortable, of eating crow and being humbled and re-evaluating. It’s probably hard to start that process if you’ve been told that every thought you have is golden and should be given voice, and that people who are offended by what you say are hypersensitive simpletons."

PostBourgie (via thugzmansion)

have repeated this countless times - yet it bears repeating again and again and again…

"Anyone can write, but to write well and often and for pay can be a hard and lonely job, because to do it honestly requires - at least at the beginning - a certain amount of boring self-analysis whereby professional and existential crisis feed exhaustingly off one another. To be an honest political writer or journalist today is constantly to negotiate and re-negotiate the complicated relationship between conviction and orthodoxy, between critical reportage and activism-as-journalism."

Laurie Penny (April 2012)

(Source: warrenellis.com)