à l'allure garçonnière

my real blog is alagarconniere.wordpress.com.

tumblr visitor

#rage

ethiopienne:

gradientlair:

Naomi Campbell on racism in fashion

Ah. So basically Naomi Campbell discussed how institutional racism impacts the fashion industry and the White male interviewer wanted it to be about her personal “anger” in incidents unrelated to fashion. Naomi Campbell discussed her passion about making the industry diverse and the White male interviewer wanted to parse “good” angry versus “bad” angry. Naomi Campbell discussed how there is a systemic issue in the industry and the White male interviewer wanted to discuss how Naomi herself, individually succeeded so doesn’t that exceptionalism prove that racism in the industry isn’t an issue? Ugh.

They literally are operating from different frames of thought; hers shaped by reality of what she sees and documents (with actual numbers in some instances) and his based on White male privilege and individualism fostered by both exceptionalism and stereotypes, which will never speak to systemic issues.

This interview is a microcosm of what it is like to confront White privilege, racism and White supremacy on any issue. Even those who want to “find out” more and may even compliment us often cannot think past their own privilege. One of the key problems involved in thinking shaped by White privilege is the role individualism plays, intellectually. To them, everything at worst falls under a negative stereotype and at best can be summarized by positive exceptionalism. NEITHER of these speak to institutional, structural and systemic issues of racism.

Oh and notice how she parsed racism here. As the act that the people who work for the designers engaged in, not whether or not the designers or their people are “racist.” This is important. Because Whites love to escape “racist” as a label. Okay, fine. Let’s talk about what they DID and SAID, and intent is irrelevant, as she mentioned they may not “know” what they did with their casting etc. Her own words reveal this the chasm between the way they think…

I’m not here to talk about me, I’m here to talk about balanced diversity.

I’m not angry. And I don’t like the thing of the ‘angry Black woman’ either; this is not what this is about. 

We feel passionate. Feeling passion about something doesn’t mean you have to be angry.

Naomi = brilliant.

A+ commentary, both gradientlair’s and Naomi’s

amajor7:

Reference.
Other reasons to not shop at Urban Outfitters:
The co-founder of UO and President Richard Haynes has supported and contributed over $13,000 to Rick Santorum (who has compared homosexuality to bestiality, is a climate change denier, an all around hater of women). (x)
They have been accused of stealing work from independent artists. (x)
They have sold clothing promoting eating disorders. (x)

They have been mis-using the term “Navajo" to sell everything from flasks to underwear and are only now responding - to concerns that have been raised for years - since they’ve been taken to court. (x)
I wrote about my own issues with Urban Outfitters back in June 2010. 
Do not support this shitty company that does more shitty things than I can count. They promote racist, sexist, body-hating, homophobic, transphobic ideologies all while hocking you overpriced clothing that was mostly likely ripped off of independent designers. It’s just a bad idea all around.

amajor7:

Reference.

Other reasons to not shop at Urban Outfitters:

  • The co-founder of UO and President Richard Haynes has supported and contributed over $13,000 to Rick Santorum (who has compared homosexuality to bestiality, is a climate change denier, an all around hater of women). (x)
  • They have been accused of stealing work from independent artists. (x)
  • They have sold clothing promoting eating disorders. (x)
  • They have been mis-using the term “Navajo" to sell everything from flasks to underwear and are only now responding - to concerns that have been raised for years - since they’ve been taken to court. (x)
  • I wrote about my own issues with Urban Outfitters back in June 2010.
  • Do not support this shitty company that does more shitty things than I can count. They promote racist, sexist, body-hating, homophobic, transphobic ideologies all while hocking you overpriced clothing that was mostly likely ripped off of independent designers. It’s just a bad idea all around.

DE BEERS DECISION TO DUMP SEWAGE INTO ATTAWAPISKAT PLAYED ROLE IN HOUSING CRISIS »

rebelrebelbatcat:

ndnsurgency:

For fuck sakes!!! I *HATE* Debeers so much it makes me sick to my stomach. The worst part is that people wouldn’t have ever known these things if not for the current media shitstorm happening. i’m glad this is all getting out there, it certainly shows these organizations for how much they value profits over people. 

If you didn’t have enough reasons to hate DeBeers and the diamond industry already, here’s another one! Ugh.

Presented without commentary.

I HATE TERRY RICHARDSON

…but i mostly hate it when he photographs people i like and respect. not just because it makes me question them, but because it means my tumblr dashboard is filled with reblogs of photos of babes that queer people like such as chloe sevigny and freja beha… but they’re still photographs by terry richardson. i used to have a “unfollow” if people post a) b) or c) (either things i find triggering or offensive) but damn some of y’all are still cool.

so here’s a refresher:

  1. fuck terry richardson
  2. fuck any of his photography, of anyone
  3. fuck him

i don’t care what he photographs, whether it be kittens or a fucking war zone - it doesn’t change the fact that he is still an abusive sexist piece of shit douchebag who refuses to take responsibility for his behaviour. by reblogging his shit or following his tumblr you’re kind of giving the thumbs up (haha) to the practices he uses (manipulation, exploitation, etc) to take those photographs, and to be paid a pretty penny to do so. 

i can’t for the life of me understand why any fashion magazine or brand continues to hire him, i find it indefensible. fuck the way he treats women, fuck the way he treats his mother (slightly ableist headline/imperfect article, but important questions about ethics), fuck terry richardson.

catsluck:

 Does anyone know who made this?

(via myteacuptempest)
tumblr, why you gotta be like that? why do you consistently take away credit from incredible awesome artists! and i find more often than not it happens to be from zinesters and crafters (like maranda elizabeth's words).
CREDIT: this was made by amy dame, a badass queer artist based in vancouver. click the photo for her explanation of the awesome piece.

catsluck:

 Does anyone know who made this?

(via myteacuptempest)

tumblr, why you gotta be like that? why do you consistently take away credit from incredible awesome artists! and i find more often than not it happens to be from zinesters and crafters (like maranda elizabeth's words).

CREDIT: this was made by amy dame, a badass queer artist based in vancouver. click the photo for her explanation of the awesome piece.

LAST I HAVE TO SAY ABOUT THIS - TW for discussions of racism

… i really wonder how effective it is to reblog these photoshoot photos with commentary, whether it be productive, polite, or expressing rage. the more i see them, and the more i read the responses to criticisms, the more pissed off and upset i get. right now, i am just seeing hateful diatribe being spouted by whoever is behind PORK’s twitter feed (not linking it because it is fucked up and was really triggering for me). oh, and if that’s not enough, as a response to criticisms, sean aaberg is posting (once again not linking to any of this bullshit because it is gross) RACIST AS FUCK cartoons from the 30s and 40s to defend a questionable (to put it lightly) photoshoot made and published in 2011? real bright. ah, must be nice to be a smug, privileged white person who can be nostalgic for an era where racism was just so much more acceptable! and anyone who criticizes it is just oversensitive and taken one too many “racial studies classes,” according to this douchebag.

SO! in short, i find this shit really enraging and fucked up and am disengaging from it. please don’t send me messages or emails about it anymore, i’m just going to step away for my own self-care at this point. i sent them an email to get everything i needed off my chest before noticing this little gem: the white guy from Oakland who is posting some of the most racist/ableist/just straight up rude shit on pork’s website? he calls himself a god damn “shape shifting trickster” in his bio. what a crock of shit!
 
this is the last you’ll read about this fuckery on my tumblr. what could have been settled with a simple genuine apology has turned into a sad, pathetic mess. this has just gotten to another level of fucked-up ness.

TW for Cultural Appropriation & Racism in Fat Spaces

fatpeopleofcolor:

The other day I was on tumblr and came across PORK’s newest photos from a Wild West editorial. I must say I was quite disheartened and was not alone in this feeling, since, as I looked at the commentary it was apparent that many other people of color were upset as well. 

These are some of the images, but if you click here it takes you to the rest of them. 

[Image: Five white people standing in front of a loading garage. Two are above them, standing on the edge of the garage, three are beneath on the ground. They are all striking poses. They are dressed in styled clothes. The two standing at the top are appropriating Native items. The woman on the right is appropriating a fake leather headdress and face paint. The man to her right wears another fake headdress, face paint, and a fringed leather shirt that is open, showing his bare chest.]

[Image: A light skinned, non-Native woman with appropriated red face paint on her cheeks, a leather faux-headdress on her head, dressed in leather fringe vest, and low cut jeans with two fake Old West style guns stuck into her belt. She is taking a swig from a bottle of Jack Daniels (a type of whiskey).]

Oh yes, they included someone dressed up as a Native American drinking some Whiskey. Never mind how very problematic and hurtful this is considering the high alcoholism rate among Native American populations.

[Image: A light skinned, non-Native man wearing an appropriated, faux-headdress, shirtless, with a leather strap across his body with brass rings on it. He is holding up a fake Old West style gun, pointed towards the sky.]

I wrote a couple of things on tumblr about these photos, but the more I thought about them, the more heated I got. I thought about writing a letter to PORK, but then I came across their “about me” section and their twitter.

[Image: A screencap of the Pork Magazine twitter feed, with four different tweets that read:

Headache!

Sometimes the moron trap works so well that it’s kind of depressing.

I’m so racist, when I get a new pack of crayons, I take out all the colors except for white & peach.

Wow these people use “hipster” like they’re calling Black people “nigger”. Pretty intense.]

From their twitter :

And from their homepage: 

[Image: A screencap of a written blog post titled “CAMP & KITSCH IN PORK.” Beneath: “Posted on July 18, 2001 by Sean Aaberg.”

The text beneath reads: “PORK is fueled by Camp & Kitsch. Both of these aesthetics require a certain degree of sophistication & a certain degree of “Not taking things so seriously.” PORK does not believe in cultural ownership or the concept of “genuine”. Things are either done well or not done well. When we are pestered by special interest groups advocating their world view & that our magazine some how conforms to their world view, I immediately wonder, “What have you done for me lately?”

Camp is an aesthetic sensibility that regards something as appealing because of its bad taste and ironic value. The concept is closely related to kitsch, and things with camp appeal may be described as being “cheesy”. When the usage appeared, in 1909, it denoted: ostentatious, exaggerated, affected, theatrical, and effeminate behavior, and, by the middle of 1970’s, the definition comprised: banality, artifice, mediocrity and ostentation so extreme as to have perversely sophisticated appeal. American writer Susan Sontag’s essay Notes on “Camp” (1964) emphasised its key elements as: artifice, frivolity, naive middle-class pretentiousness, and ‘shocking’ excess. Camp as an aesthetic has been popular from the 1960’s to the present.

Kitsch is a form of art that is considered an inferior, tasteless copy of an extant style of art or a worthless imitation of art of recognized value. The concept is associated with the deliberate use of elements that may be thought of as cultural icons while making cheap mass-produced objects that are unoriginal. Kitsch also refers to the types of art that are aesthetically deficient (whether or not being sentimental, glamorous, theatrical, or creative) and that make creative gestures which merely imitate the superficial appearances of art through repeated conventions and formulae. Excessive sentimentality often is associated with the term.”]

After reading all of that, I felt like even if I were to send out a letter, i would be ignored, told I was being “too sensitive” or that I “just don’t get it.” But I think I do get it and even if a person of color — a Native American person at that — was involved in this photo shoot(I am not assuming anyone’s race or ethnicity in the photo shoot), it still doesn’t make it any less culturally appropriative. These pictures look mocking, not appreciative or “ironic.” And to be quite honest, most of the time I’ve seen “ironic” humor it’s offensive. These costumes strip away any meaning and devalue Native American customs and traditions and dress. 

I can only speak for myself, but I feel as though when white dominated fat spaces do/write/say culturally appropriative things and do not apologize or try to make right their wrong, it alienates fat people of color. In doing so, the fat acceptance movement suffers. This is why fat colored people need to be showcased more and involved more and included in white fat acceptance spaces. Not make our own off to the side, but integrated into white fat spaces. Safe spaces are important, but integration is just as important.

Where are all of the white fat activists at in calling this type of behavior out? Solidarity is needed within the fat movement. 

What I would like to say to PORK is that you ask what have I done for you lately? How about I’ve been an ally, a supporter, a fan. Please don’t tell us to get over it or justify this kind of behavior. Say you’re sorry, admit you were wrong, and take down the pictures. That’s how we can remain allies. Once again, I only speak for myself, but I’m betting other people of color would like this as well.

Any for anyone who would like to further read upon cultural appropriation, check out these links:

http://nativeappropriations.blogspot.com/

http://www.racialicious.com/2008/09/18/cultural-appropriation-homage-or-insult/

- Samantha, angstiosis@tumblr

ETA: image descriptions—thanks madamethursday!

 real, real, real disappointing.

the statement that PORK magazine does not believe in “cultural ownership” or the concept of “genuine” as a response to those criticizing this photoshoot is pretty weak. once again, these sorts of arguments serve to completely dismiss the question of (white) privilege. even if you disagree that white people wearing headdresses for fashion photoshoots is not “cultural appropriation,” i think it’s been highlighted clearly enough why these images, specifically (or rather, especially) the image of the light-skinned (presumably) non-native woman swigging back jack daniels has been read by many as perpetuating negative stereotypes of native women.

i’m going to put it out there: it’s all well and dandy to say “hey, we thought this would be read as kitschy and campy, sorry if we inadvertently/unintentionally served to reinforce a bunch of shitty stereotypes about native people.” but that’s not what was said. what was said was, “anyone who thinks this photoshoot is racist, offensive, or just plain poor taste is a moron who doesn’t get it. you don’t deserve an apology.” because really, it can be that simple. taking a minute to think about what people are saying, what concerns they are raising, and genuinely apologizing.

but i forgot, you don’t believe in the concept of “genuine.”