the dangers of photoshopping Idle No More

i can’t actually begin to express how frustrating it is to come across blatantly photoshopped images like this one circulating without an end in sight. with thousands of notes and tens of thousands of hits:

a poorly photoshopped image of protestors on a highway in the same of a middle finger with the words "HARPER" written in the upper left corner. the original photograph was taken on april 22, 2012 by Jacques Nadeau for Le Devoir.

why does an image like this one get reblogged so much? because it made you chuckle to think protestors would block a highway in the same of a giant middle finger, regardless of the cause? (have you ever been a protest/in a crowd of thousands, do you know how complicated that would be?) because you think all this movement is about is a big fuck you to one individual person named stephen harper and not decades of ongoing disenfranchisement of first nations, métis and inuit people? because you delude yourself into thinking, by pressing reblog, you get to pat yourself on the back for being engaged and support “first nations rights” without even clicking the photo to see the source, when and where it was taken, or whether or not it is even real?

let’s get right down to it: if you are not informed at this point, it is your own choice. idle no more has been going on for over a month, in your own backyard and around the world. here are your visuals, here are your links. idle no more is being reported about by some of the world’s major media outlets now, like al-jazeera.

it is supported by thousands of academics, native and non-native. there have been countless protests, round dances, drum circles, peaceful highway and railroad blockades. and when i say countless, i mean countless: in the last week it has become near impossible for activists, journalists and analysts to keep track of every action taking place around the globe.

attawapiskat chief theresa spence is over twenty days into her hunger strike, demanding simply she be granted a meeting with canada’s prime minister stephen harper and a representative of the queen (in case you needed to be reminded that yes, canada has an ongoing outdated colonial relationship with britain and yes, the fucking queen).

all of this to say, yes, idle no more is worthy of your reblogs, your likes, and your attention. but more importantly, it is worth being taken seriously.

what makes the rampant circulation falsified images like this one even worse is that there are so many actual images that are so much more impressive. images taken by people on the ground with their mobile phones, like this one in the mall of america on december 29th.

image

you can’t stage that kind of photo! “the next big thing is here” juxtaposed over the beautiful round dance! or say, witty protest signs like “if you do not respect our existence, you can expect our resistance,” taken on december 22nd in ottawa. or if you’re not so much into still images, what about this video of protestors in quebec city in the middle of an intense snowstorm on dec 21st, still singing and drumming and smiling even with 100 km winds.

you want to do justice to this movement? read up on it. stop circulating fake images. look for dates, for the author. message people you see circulating photoshopped images. ask them where they found the image. ask them why they are sharing it. ask them if they might consider deleting it, or at least adding a note that it is faked or photoshopped. unfortunately, this is still not enough, seeing as i messaged the person who originally posted this photo to tumblr - who, for the record, claims to have known it was fake “haha” - and still see smart, informed, critical folks reblogging it sans cesse.

at the end of the day, it is important to recognize these kinds of photoshopped falsified images of protest as dangerous. this is misinformation. this is sloppy. if there is anything that has become clear to me after following the occupy movement online (not to mention major weather events and storms, media literacy is increasingly becoming an essential tool for young people. last year so many people came to me asking what i thought of kony the day after the video went viral, without actually taking the time to read and inform themselves. if you don’t have the critical analysis skills yourself, seek out people who do.

start informing and educating yourself. movements like idle no more don’t just want you to use their hashtag and reblog photoshopped images like this, they want your active engagement. they want change. 

follow chief spence on twitter. call and email your elected officials if you live in canada. bother senators and parliamentarians who are supposed to serve your interests as a citizen. see what actions, if any, are taking place in your community. there are over fifteen links just here in this one post - click on at least one of them, read them. listen. and more importantly, ask questions.

edited to add: the original photo is from april 22, 2012 by Jacques Nadeau for Le Devoir. the photoshopped version appears to have cloned a larger crowd and added the “harper” in the upper left hand corner.

mideastcuts:

Ghada Karmi and Ellen Siegel, in 1973, 1992 and 2011. Photos by Francis Khoo (1, 2) and Jean-Pascal Deillon (3)

mideastcuts:

Ghada Karmi and Ellen Siegel, in 1973, 1992 and 2011. Photos by Francis Khoo (1, 2) and Jean-Pascal Deillon (3)

"What is interesting, is that the Frida Kahlo venerated by American feminists is a very different Frida Kahlo to the one people learn about in Mexico, in the Chicano community. In her country, she is recognized as an important artist and a key figure in revolutionary politics of early 20th century Mexico. Her communist affiliations are made very clear. Her relationship with Trotsky is underscored. All her political activities with Diego Rivera are constantly emphasized. The connection between her art and her politics is always made. When Chicana artists became interested in Frida Kahlo in the ‘70s and started organizing homages, they made the connection between her artistic project and theirs because they too were searching for an aesthetic compliment to a political view that was radical and emancipatory. But when the Euro-American feminists latch onto Frida Kahlo in the early ‘80s and when the American mainstream caught on to her, she was transformed into a figure of suffering. I am very critical of that form of appropriation."

— Coco Fusco on her Amerindians piece from 1992 with Guillermo Gómez-Peña (via mayalikeskafka)

(Source: bombsite.com, via rainbowchardkittenpants)

"The universe of ideas and legislation and thoughts and directions we could go in are much bigger than the narratives we are getting from the two campaigns. The main takeaway there is that candidates set the agenda. And that’s a real problem, when there isn’t real independent thought about the directions we could go in …I think we should all sit down and make the decision not to cover every single thing that happens for its impact on one candidate or another. I see no value in that. Journalists have to stop spending their time just trying to figure out who is gonna win. I don’t think that’s the service that any of us signed up for, I don’t know how it became our mission."

Andrea Seabrook in an interview with guest host Jonathan Goldstein on The Current (November 2nd, 2012)

Woke up this morning to hear some of the most insightful and thought-provoking discussions I’ve heard all campaign long. Recommended to anyone jaded about politics, political reporting, or the US election campaign (which seems to be just about everyone these days). Listen to the whole thing. Conversation with Andrea Seabrook begins @12:45.

A gunman opened fire during a midnight victory rally today for Quebec’s new premier, killing one person and seriously wounding another. Quebec’s premier-designate, Pauline Marois of the Parti Québécois, was whisked off the stage while giving her speech (see video). Details are still unfolding.

watching this all unfold live last night made me feel ill.

"The thing about cultural appropriation is that the appropriator does not have to face the same consequences that we do for practicing our culture or faith. For them, it is an accessory that can be taken on or off at will, while for us, it is a way of life. …in a society where immigrants and communities of color are marginalized at every level, we can’t pretend that power relations do not exist when we have this conversation about appropriation. Sharing and exchanging cultural and spiritual practices is great, but it gets more complicated when we’re not all on equal footing. It gets more complicated when meaningful things are taken, commodified, and exploited for a profit, with little respect shown to the community they were taken from."

Turbans on the Runway: What does it mean for Sikhs? by Sonny Singh Brooklynwala (July 10th, 2012)

gussyyoself:

ourcatastrophe:

I am somewhat interested in fashion, but certain clear-cut exceptions aside (fascist symbols, misappropriated regalia, etc) I don’t believe individual style choices significantly help or harm your political goals.  I think visual culture of all kinds is of central importance to being human but too slippery, too polyvalent, too fluid, too cooptable to be of significant tactical value in a plan for political action.  my political values are a deeply felt part of me and therefore influence everything I do including how I dress, but it’s all very individual and not readily decodable. wearing a particular shade of eyeshadow because it makes my eyes look more green and that makes me feel like a witch is obviously influenced by my feminist politics, but it’s not the same thing as wearing a pro-choice t-shirt or whatever, and most fashion isn’t. 

so when I talk politics and fashion, or any other intersection of politics and visual culture, I’m still usually, primarily talking aesthetics.  I’m saying “this is how this makes me feel and what it makes me think of”, not “this is what should be condemned and what should be done instead”.  if I’ve said a particular fashion is politically regressive (and I know I’m given to hyperbole but it’s not that often that I’ve actually said that) the negative consequences of wearing that would be about 2% betraying the movement and about 98% potentially looking dorky.  likewise, wearing something politically interesting is probably not going to do anything other than make you look cool. 

basically I just want to talk about stuff in a way that doesn’t make an artificial divide between the political and non-political but that keeps out “literally everything I do is revolutionary because I chose it, fuck you” feminism.

bolded mine & just things to think about. 

(i don’t necessarily agree with this but definitely) thought-provoking.

(via gussyyoself-deactivated20120630)

hello-amber:

wornjournal:

It’s rare that a protest movement affects the way thousands of people get dressed, but the strike has done just that, turning the red square into both a symbol of solidarity and, for some, a conscious fashion statement.

Read “Seeing Red” by our Montreal Wornette, Sacha Jackson, on the WORN blog.

Lookit who it is!

click on the link to read the full article! these are really great portraits with a nice article. my friend salima punjani took some photos on june 22nd here in quebec city and the lip red square came up more than a few times:

two female protestors on june 22nd in quebec city, photo taken by Salima Punjani

i’ve been finding it really compelling to see how people have adopted the red square here in quebec. after years of recycled ribbons for various causes, it’s refreshing to see a lot of creativity coming out of this movement. if it draws more attention to the cause at the end of the day, and gets more people thinking critically, i think that’s amazing.

(via hello-amber-deactivated20121026)

guess who just found a free pdf version of one of her favourite pieces of writing ever? THIS GUY!

louise brooks smiling

PRINTING IT OUT AND RE-READING THIS GEM IN THE BATHTUB TONIGHT.

seriously, this text, bell hooks’ and sherene razack’s complete works, bonita lawrence’s real indians and others, are up there on my all-time most important “life changing texts” list.

if we could move away from an online social awareness culture that says if you share the “right” links or click the “like” button, you’re an informed and engaged global citizen, that’d be great. be critical, read a book, get engaged. take the time to think things out. in this era of viral videos, slowing things down can be great too. take your time to wrap your head around a story. you can’t be an expert on everything, and you don’t have to have an opinion on everything.