In which Mia Mingus reads SJ activists for their ableism

crunkfeministcollective:

at this point in the game, if you’re doing social justice work, it is unacceptable to me to not have ANY mention about accessibility on your website or event info. at the very least, even a simple, “please contact us about accessibility” or “this space is not wheel chair accessible” or SOMETHING to show that you even pondered accessibility for a fleeting moment. i am not asking for disability justice here, i am just asking for basic access. and for reals, on a personal note, it would literally save me SO SO SO MUCH time in my life to not have to go on a freaking access scavenger hunt every time i want to go and be with the movements that i work my ass off for everyday. i love yall, but please get it together.

-Mia Mingus, Reading and getting able bodied folks together since 1980.

(via popca)

"And why is disability never included in discussions of natural beauty, when disability is natural? Why, when people describe ideals of natural beauty, are people with physical disabilities entirely left out?"

Disability As Beauty – this ain’t livin’ (via thugzmansion)

(via thugzmansion)

theuntitledmag:

Sick Kid - The Untitled Mag
What happens when your body slowly becomes sick, but there is never a correct diagnosis? Written by Aiden.

theuntitledmag:

Sick Kid - The Untitled Mag

What happens when your body slowly becomes sick, but there is never a correct diagnosis? Written by Aiden.

Her Body Is Not Your Playground: Why the Photoshopped Frida Nudes Are Not Okay

blackgirldangerous:

by Mia McKenzie

October 25, 2012

A couple of months ago, I started seeing these images going around on Facebook, of Frida Kahlo in various stages of nudity. They were being posted and re-posted by several people I like, awesome POCs whose admiration of Frida Kahlo I definitely share. But something about the images seemed off to me. I mean, where had all these new images come from, all of a sudden? I decided to click on the link, to actually follow it to a web page. And there I discovered the awful truth: that these were all photoshopped images of Frida Kahlo’s face on someone else’s body.

Why would anyone do this? I mean, okay, there are all kinds of photoshopped pics of celebrity heads attached to naked bodies that don’t belong to them. Apparently, the desire to see a woman with her clothes off is so powerful to some people that seeing her with someone else’s clothes off will suffice. I won’t lie. I don’t get it. But I guess some people are into that. Okay. But, right or wrong, I guess I don’t personally associate this phenomenon with the kind of folks who actually know who Frida Kahlo is. Further, I guess I expect that people who do know who she is, and who care enough to click and share a link about her, would respect her enough to not want to see her objectified, and in such extreme ways. But then I realized that the person behind all of this was a white man. And I was like, “Oh. Yeah. Figures.” When did the idea of respecting the image, body, or identity of women of color ever trump the need for white men (or any men, really) to do whatever they please? Brown and black women have been treated as beasts of the sexual burden of white men for hundreds of years. White men have regarded the bodies of dark women as plantation playgrounds, where they can rape and abuse and use as they please, for centuries. This is yet another way to do that. Without any rightful claim to it, this person has taken the idea of Frida Kahlo’s body, staked a claim to it, used it for what he desires, and called it art.

Is this art? Really? Is this “genius” the way it is described here? Or is it just the same old racist, misogynist bullshit?

Don’t answer. It’s a rhetorical question.

There is more at play here, too, than just racism and misogyny (as if those aren’t enough). The fact of the matter is that Frida Kahlo did not likely have a body that looked like any of the bodies being used for these photoshopped images. The real, authentic nude photographs of Frida that exist only show her naked from the front, and from the waist up. What we know about her life is that she was a victim in a terrible bus crash in her youth, and that the results of that crash included years of surgeries, full-body casts, and the inability to have children.

From Bio.com:

Kahlo was impaled by a steel handrail, which went into her hip and came out the other side. She suffered several serious injuries as a result, including fractures in her spine and pelvis.

Following the accident, Frida would go on to have more than thirty surgeries.

We’d have to be in some serious denial to think that these things did not affect the way Frida’s body looked. There were surely scars, surely much evidence of decades of pain and surgery and brokenness. To replace that broken, scarred body with smooth, un-flawed flesh, as in these photoshopped pics, is plainly able-ist. Further, it dishonors the life Frida Kahlo lived and the experiences she survived. Here was a woman, an artist, whose artistic expression had everything to do with her physical pain, everything to do with existing inside a body that was twisted and gnarled, a body that hurt every day. To erase that is to attempt to erase Frida herself.

At the rate these pics are being shared, if this keeps up, these images of Frida Kahlo, which are not images of Frida Kahlo at all, will replace the authentic images that we have of her in our hearts and minds. People who don’t know her story, who don’t realize how fake these images are, will take them as the truth when there is no truth in them, when they are blatant lies. Lies created by someone who shares neither her color, nor her gender, nor her pain.

Whenever I see one of these photos posted in my Facebook news feed, I write a comment to let the person who posted it know that it’s fake and why that’s fucked-up. Maybe if others join me in this practice, we can help save the real image of Frida from erasure.

Mia McKenzie is a writer and a smart, scrappy Philadelphian with a deep love of vegan pomegranate ice cream and fake fur collars. She is a black feminist and a freaking queer, facts that are often reflected in her writings, which have won her some awards and grants, such as the Astraea Foundation’s Writers Fund Award and the Leeway Foundation’s Transformation Award. She has a novel debuting in the fall and has a short story forthcoming in The Kenyon Review. Her work has been published at Jezebel.com, and recommended by The Root, Colorlines, Feministing, Angry Asian Man, and Crunk Feminist Collective. She is a nerd, and the creator of Black Girl Dangerous, a revolutionary blog.

See Mia in Beloved: A Requiem for Our Dead

Follow @BlackGirlDanger

LIKE us on Facebook

I HAD STARTED WRITING SOMETHING LIKE THIS TOO BECAUSE THERE IS VERY LITTLE THAT ENRAGES ME AS MUCH BUT IT WAS JUST IN ALL CAPS AND SWEAR WORDS. LUCKILY, MIA SAYS IT BETTER AND BEST FUCKING READ THIS SHIT PEOPLE WHO REBLOG THESE STUPID FUCKING PHOTOSHOPPED PIECES OF GARBAGE

"Feminism is the political theory and practice to free all women: women of color, working-class women, poor women, physically challenged women, lesbians, old women, as well as white economically privileged heterosexual women. Anything less than this is not feminism, but merely female self-aggrandizement."

-Barbara Smith of the Combahee River Collective, 1982. (via feministmonsta)

TAKE NOTES.

(via theuntitledmag)

happylambie:


Frida Kahlo wearing a robe, holding a gun


this almost had me fooled, and then had me enraged. this is a photoshopped image. quote from the person who made it:

More Frida nudes for the blog, but that last few i put up were not very good photoshop-wise, and received some negative feedback thereof, so I took them down, and also off the AngryL page. Might be time to stop. The shot with the gun, and the Patti Smith image are probably to peak. Leave it be, it’s getting habitual, addictive and depressing. Nude in bed with towel on head is pretty good, but not striking. Still, people like her, and like the images, and I wrestle a bit with morality of creating images that people think are real - even it they give them pleasure - is there any harm? Do I fear the harm to myself my intentionally deceiving people. Thing is, a big part of the fun is trying to create images so authentic that they trick people, but I plan to add a disclaimer to the page that they are fake, and that I mean no harm. Odd that I care so much. Fear mainly. Fear is good.

i do think there is harm in falsifying an image like this one and circulating it online without context or credit. and i do think it is immoral. and i do think it’s high-time for me to work on a piece about the industry of frida kahlo’s image and pitch it somewhere… seriously this is unbelievably shitty.
for the record, the most downloaded image from my tumblr is this one.
earlier:
rgr-pop re: nikolas murray’s frida kahlo portraits
images of frida on tumblr
frida kahlo tag on my tumblr

happylambie:

Frida Kahlo wearing a robe, holding a gun

this almost had me fooled, and then had me enraged. this is a photoshopped image. quote from the person who made it:

More Frida nudes for the blog, but that last few i put up were not very good photoshop-wise, and received some negative feedback thereof, so I took them down, and also off the AngryL page. Might be time to stop. The shot with the gun, and the Patti Smith image are probably to peak. Leave it be, it’s getting habitual, addictive and depressing. Nude in bed with towel on head is pretty good, but not striking. Still, people like her, and like the images, and I wrestle a bit with morality of creating images that people think are real - even it they give them pleasure - is there any harm? Do I fear the harm to myself my intentionally deceiving people. Thing is, a big part of the fun is trying to create images so authentic that they trick people, but I plan to add a disclaimer to the page that they are fake, and that I mean no harm. Odd that I care so much. Fear mainly. Fear is good.

i do think there is harm in falsifying an image like this one and circulating it online without context or credit. and i do think it is immoral. and i do think it’s high-time for me to work on a piece about the industry of frida kahlo’s image and pitch it somewhere… seriously this is unbelievably shitty.

for the record, the most downloaded image from my tumblr is this one.

earlier:

(via snackalupagus)

"To depict the eroticized grotesque female form on a public stage breaks implied ordinances around which bodies are permissible to be seen. A century and a half of institutionalized residences for those deemed too disabled to be a part of society existed in Canada until as recently as 2005, when the largest was closed (a full 30 years after the federal government had been informed of the widespread abuse and violations of human rights at these institutions). And not before the vacant facility was exhibited for the sensationalizing whims of the media."

- what if I told you it was an accident? by jes sasche (march 15, 2012)

a fantastic article that touches on disability, nationalism, canadian identity politics, some of my favourite artists, and bodies rebelling. read the whole thing.

ugly

“These are the axes: (No. 3)”, after Mark Aguhar’s ‘Axes’ // DiamondMind (2012)

thinking a lot about beauty and ugliness these days. some great reads:

Axes by Mark Aguhar

Moving toward the ugly: A Politic Beyond Desirability by mia mingus (August 2011)

Ugly Cute by Definatalie (December 2011)

Ugly Femme Pride by Definatalie (December 2011)

Uninvested in Being Beautiful by Lesley Kinsey (October 2009)

"The magnificence of a body that shakes, spills out, takes up space, needs help, moseys, slinks, limps, drools, rocks, curls over on itself. The magnificence of a body that doesn’t get to choose when to go to the bathroom, let alone which bathroom to use. A body that doesn’t get to choose what to wear in the morning, what hairstyle to sport, how they’re going to move or stand, or what time they’re going to bed. The magnificence of bodies that have been coded, not just undesirable and ugly, but un-human. The magnificence of bodies that are understanding gender in far more complex ways than I could explain in an hour. Moving beyond a politic of desirability to loving the ugly. Respecting Ugly for how it has shaped us and been exiled. Seeing its power and magic, seeing the reasons it has been feared. Seeing it for what it is: some of our greatest strength."

Moving Toward the Ugly: A Politic Beyond Desirability by Mia Mingus

re-reading this for the fourth time this year, i am in tears. mia mingus moves me in ways i cannot fully express.

disabilityawareness:

[Description:  Two circles, both blue with white text.  
The first circle reads, “WHAT ABLEISM IS: A set of taught practices  and subconscious or conscious behaviors against people with disabilities  and illnesses which assumes that being able is the norm, and people  with disabilities must either strive to fit that norm or keep their  distance from people who are able. Ableism often sees  disability as an error of life, a wrong way to live, and therefore often  negates any life experiences of the disabled.“ 
The second circle reads, “WHAT PEOPLE THINK ABLEISM IS: My feelings are hurt because you used the r-word.]

disabilityawareness:

[Description:  Two circles, both blue with white text.  

The first circle reads, “WHAT ABLEISM IS: A set of taught practices and subconscious or conscious behaviors against people with disabilities and illnesses which assumes that being able is the norm, and people with disabilities must either strive to fit that norm or keep their distance from people who are able. Ableism often sees disability as an error of life, a wrong way to live, and therefore often negates any life experiences of the disabled.“ 

The second circle reads, “WHAT PEOPLE THINK ABLEISM IS: My feelings are hurt because you used the r-word.]

(Source: , via formelyusako-deactivated2012090)