bell hooks by sarah julia clark
"I still think it’s important for people to have a sharp, ongoing critique of marriage in patriarchal society — because once you marry within a society that remains patriarchal, no matter how alternative you want to be within your unit, there is still a culture outside you that will impose many, many values on you whether you want them to or not."
—
bell hooks, On Marriage
that’s it exactly, that’s exactly it
(via derica)
YUP. sad but very true.
(Source: kdhume, via modernistwitch-deactivated20120)
WHY “WHITE SUPREMACIST CAPITALIST PATRIARCHY?”
BELL HOOKS: I began to use the phrase in my work “white supremacist capitalist patriarchy” because I wanted to have some language that would actually remind us continually of the interlocking systems of domination that define our reality and not to just have one thing be like, you know, gender is the important issue, race is the important issue, but for me the use of that particular jargonistic phrase was a way, a sort of short cut way of saying all of these things actually are functioning simultaneously at all times in our lives and that if I really want to understand what’s happening to me, right now at this moment in my life, as a black female of a certain age group, I won’t be able to understand it if I’m only looking through the lens of race. I won’t be able to understand it if I’m only looking through the lens of gender. I won’t be able to understand it if I’m only looking at how white people see me.
To me an important breakthrough, I felt, in my work and that of others was the call to use the term white supremacy, over racism because racism in and of itself did not really allow for a discourse of colonization and decolonization, the recognition of the internalized racism within people of color and it was always in a sense keeping things at the level at which whiteness and white people remained at the center of the discussion.
In my classroom I might say to students that you know that when we use the term white supremacy it doesn’t just evoke white people, it evokes a political world that we can all frame ourselves in relationship to….
And so for me those words were very much about the constant reminder, one of institutional construct, that we’re not talking about personal construct in the sense of, how do you feel about me as a woman, or how do you feel about me as a black person?
… We have to problematize nationalism beyond race, in all kinds of ways that I think there’s a tremendous reluctance […] to have a more complex accounting of identity.
From BELL HOOKS—CULTURAL CRITISICM & TRANSFORMATION, Produced & Directed by Sut Jhally
(for the record, seeing this in 1999 changed my life.)
(Source: google.ca)
i’ve seen a lot of things on my dash today…
…that makes me think people need to either pick up a bell hooks book or re-read the ones they read years ago.
(Source: google.ca)
"many of us choose relationships of affection that will never become loving because they feel safer. the demands are not as intense as loving requires. the risk is not as great."
— bell hooks
All About Love: New Visions
via missreneec. (via tobia)
(Source: ladulcita, via woc-resist)
